| 
  • Earn a $50 Amazon gift card for testing a new product from the makers of PBworks. Click here to apply.

  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

View
 

The Rosetta Stone of Logical Frameworks

Page history last edited by Alexandra Pittman 8 years, 10 months ago

 

Jim Rugh. “The Rosetta Stone of Logical Frameworks." Care International and InterAction’s Evaluation Interest Group

 

COMPARISONS BETWEEN TERMINOLOGIES OF DIFFERENT DONOR AGENCIES for RESULTS / LOGICAL FRAMEWORKS

Compiled by Jim Rugh for CARE International and InterAction’s Evaluation Interest Group

 

 

Ultimate Impact

End Outcomes

Intermediate Outcomes

Outputs

Interventions

Needs-based

Higher Consequence

Specific Problem

Cause

Solution

Process

Inputs

CARE terminology[1]

Program Impact

Project Impact

Effects

Outputs

Activities

Inputs

CARE logframe

Program Goal

Project Final Goal

Intermediate Objectives

Outputs

Activities

Inputs

PC/LogFrame[2]

 

Goal

Purpose

Outputs

Activities

 

USAID Results Framework[3]

Strategic Objective

Intermediate Results

Outputs

Activities

Inputs

USAID Logframe[4]

 

Final Goal

Strategic Goal/ Objective

Intermediate results

Activities

202E

DANIDA + DfID[5]

Goal

Purpose

Outputs

Activities

 

CIDA[6] + GTZ[7]

Overall goal

Project purpose

Results/outputs

Activities

Inputs

European Union[8]

Overall Objective

Project Purpose

Results

Activities

 

FAO[9] + UNDP[10] + NORAD[11]

Development Objective

Immediate Objectives

Outputs

Activities

Inputs

UNHCR[12]

Sector Objective

Goal

Project Objective

Outputs

Activities

Input/Resources

World Bank

Long-term Objectives

Short-term Objectives

Outputs

 

Inputs

AusAID[13]

Scheme Goal

Major Development Objectives

Outputs

Activities

Inputs

 


[1] CARE Impact Guidelines, October 1999.

[2] PC/LogFrame (tm) 1988-1992 TEAM technologies, Inc.

[3] Results Oriented Assistance Sourcebook, USAID, 1998.

[4] The Logical Framework Approach to portfolio Design, Review and Evaluation in A.I.D.: Genesis, Impact, Problems and Opportunities. CDIE, 1987.

[5] A Guide to Appraisal, Design, Monitoring, Management and Impact Assessment of Health & Population Projects, ODA [now DFID], October 1995.

[6] Guide for the use of the Logical Framework Approach in the Management and Evaluation of CIDA’s International Projects. Evaluation Division.

[7]  ZOPP in Steps. 1989.

[8] Project Cycle Management: Integrated Approach and Logical Framework, Commission of the European Communities Evaluation Unit Methods and Instruments for Project Cycle Management, No. 1, February 1993.

[9] Project Appraisal and the Use of Project Document Formats for FAO Technical Cooperation Projects. Pre-Course Activity: Revision of Project Formulation and  Assigned Reading.  Staff Development Group, Personnel Division, August 1992.

[10] UNDP Policy and Program Manual.

[11]  The Logical Framework Approach (LFA).  Handbook for Objectives-oriented Project Planning.

[12]  Project Planning in UNHCR: A Practical Guide on the Use of Objectives, Outputs and Indicators for UNHCR Staff and Implementing Partners. Second Ver. March 2002.

[13] AusAID NGO Package of Information, 1998.

 


 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.